From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenberg v. W. CPE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case No.: SACV 12-02074-CJC(ANx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)

Summary

finding "pure speculation on the part of the author regarding Plaintiff's possible feelings or motivations behind his actions" non-actionable statement of opinion

Summary of this case from Montgomery v. Risen

Opinion

Case No.: SACV 12-02074-CJC(ANx)

04-15-2013

DAVID GREENBERG, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN CPE, a Montana Corporation; and STEVEN D. NASH, an individual, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

After consideration of the papers in support of and in opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment brought by Defendants Western CPE and Steven D. Nash, and the oral arguments of counsel and Mr. Greenberg at the hearing on this matter on April 15, 2013, the Court hereby renders the following decision and judgment:

Judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Western CPE and Steven D. Nash on the claims of Plaintiff David Greenberg.

The basis for this summary judgment is set forth in the Court's Order dated April 15, 2013, issued concurrently herewith. This document shall constitute the judgment for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

______________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Greenberg v. W. CPE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case No.: SACV 12-02074-CJC(ANx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)

finding "pure speculation on the part of the author regarding Plaintiff's possible feelings or motivations behind his actions" non-actionable statement of opinion

Summary of this case from Montgomery v. Risen
Case details for

Greenberg v. W. CPE

Case Details

Full title:DAVID GREENBERG, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN CPE, a Montana Corporation; and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

Case No.: SACV 12-02074-CJC(ANx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

Montgomery v. Risen

The Court agrees. The assertion that Montgomery was motivated out of greed or ambition is a subjective…