From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greenberg v. Lorenz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1959
7 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Summary

In Greenberg v. Lorenz, 1959, 7 A.D.2d 968, 183 N.Y.S.2d 46 the Appellate Division dismissed the complaint of the infant on the ground that she failed to establish a cause of action.

Summary of this case from Monaco v. Chrysler Sales Corp.

Opinion

March 3, 1959


Determination modified and complaint of infant plaintiff dismissed on the ground that she has failed to establish a cause of action ( Chysky v. Drake Bros. Co., 235 N.Y. 468; Salzano v. First Nat. Stores, 268 App. Div. 993); and, as so modified, the determination is affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Stevens and Bastow, JJ.; Breitel and Valente, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Greenberg v. Lorenz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1959
7 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

In Greenberg v. Lorenz, 1959, 7 A.D.2d 968, 183 N.Y.S.2d 46 the Appellate Division dismissed the complaint of the infant on the ground that she failed to establish a cause of action.

Summary of this case from Monaco v. Chrysler Sales Corp.
Case details for

Greenberg v. Lorenz

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA GREENBERG, an Infant by LOUIS GREENBERG, Her Guardian ad Litem, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1959

Citations

7 A.D.2d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Hot Shoppes of N.Y

Subsequently, the same question was presented in the case of Greenberg v. Lorenz ( 14 Misc.2d 279). The trial…

Sanchez-Lopez v. Fedco Food Corp.

( Curley v. Ruppert, 272 App. Div. 441, 442; Cummerford v. Pepsi-Cola Co., 278 App. Div. 658.) Nor can the…