Summary
finding that possible error in voir dire based on time limits imposed by trial court was not preserved where defendant affirmatively accepted the jury without renewing prior objection
Summary of this case from Hillsman v. StateOpinion
No. 95-3711.
September 25, 1996.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; James I. Cohn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 95-5640CF10A.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Although we are concerned about the time limitations imposed by the trial court on voir dire examination, appellant did not preserve this issue for appeal, because he affirmatively accepted the jury without renewing his prior objection. Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993); Stripling v. State, 664 So.2d 2, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).
See O'Hara v. State, 642 So.2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Pineda v. State, 571 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williams v. State, 424 So.2d 148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
AFFIRMED.
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.