From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 13, 2002
259 Ga. App. 195 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

A02A2257.

DECIDED: DECEMBER 13, 2002 Reconsideration Dismissed January 14, 2003

Motion to vacate sentence. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Karpf.

Derrick L. Green, pro se. Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, Ann M. Elmore, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Derrick Leroy Green, pro se, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his motion to vacate void sentences. Because Green has not shown that the trial court had jurisdiction to consider his motion, we affirm.

In 1993, Green was convicted and sentenced in the Superior Court of Chatham County for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. In Green v. State, this court affirmed Green's direct appeal from his convictions.

In 2001, Green filed a pro se "motion to vacate null and void convictions and sentences," arguing that the Superior Court of Chatham County had not had jurisdiction of his criminal case because venue had not been established in Chatham County.

[F]or a trial court to have the power to exercise the subject matter jurisdiction to correct a judgment outside a term of court, the judgment must be, in fact, void. If the judgment is not void, a trial court has no further subject matter jurisdiction outside the term of court and the petition must be dismissed.

(Citations, punctuation, and emphasis omitted.) Syms v. State, 244 Ga. App. 21 ( 534 S.E.2d 502) (2000).

(Citations, punctuation, and emphasis omitted.) Syms v. State, 244 Ga. App. 21 ( 534 S.E.2d 502) (2000).

The trial court determined that Green had failed to show that the criminal judgment was void and thus dismissed his motion to vacate void sentences.

1. Green argues that the dismissal was error. Generally, venue in a criminal case is in the county where the crime was committed. Venue is a jurisdictional fact and must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Where venue is not established, any ensuing judgment is void.

Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. VI.; OCGA § 17-2-2(a); Newsom v. State, 183 Ga. App. 339(1) ( 359 S.E.2d 11) (1987).

Turner v. State, 273 Ga. 340, 343(3) ( 541 S.E.2d 641) (2001); Trogdon v. State, 176 Ga. App. 246, 247(1) ( 335 S.E.2d 481) (1985).

Trogdon, supra.

The transcript of Green's trial reveals that the victim testified that Green took a car from him at gunpoint in Chatham County. A reasonable trier of fact was authorized to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Green committed the crimes in Chatham County, making that county the appropriate venue for Green's trial. Green's argument that the Superior Court of Chatham County did not have jurisdiction because venue was not established is without merit. Green has not shown that his judgment is void. The trial court correctly dismissed his motion for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

See Jones v. State, 246 Ga. App. 596, 597-598(2) ( 539 S.E.2d 602) (2000).

2. Green's motion to sanction the State is denied.

Judgment affirmed. Andrews, P.J., and Mikell, J., concur.


DECIDED DECEMBER 13, 2003 — RECONSIDERATION DISMISSED JANUARY 14, 2003 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Green v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 13, 2002
259 Ga. App. 195 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Green v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREEN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 13, 2002

Citations

259 Ga. App. 195 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002)
576 S.E.2d 554

Citing Cases

Zachery v. State

9. Brewster v. State, 300 Ga.App. 143, 144, 684 S.E.2d 309 (2009) (citation omitted). FN10. Green v. State,…

Shields v. State

See, e.g., Parks v. State, 212 Ga. 433, 434 ( 93 S.E.2d 663) (1956); Futch v. State, 90 Ga. 472 (16 S.E. 302)…