From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Rodgers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 31, 2017
15-CV-2260 (RRM) (PK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2017)

Opinion

15-CV-2260 (RRM) (PK)

03-31-2017

WARREN GREEN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER RODGERS and DEPUTY LEMON, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Warren Green, pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants identified in the answer as Corrections Officer Robert Rodgers and Warden Charlton Lemon (collectively, the "Defendants"). (See Compl. (Doc. No. 1) at 4-5; Answer (Doc. No. 18) at 1.) Green alleges that on January 3, 2015 and January 7, 2015, while he was housed at the Otis Bantum Correctional Center (the "OBCC") on Rikers Island, Green requested access to his asthma pump due to problems breathing after fires broke out at the OBCC. (See Compl. at 4.) Green claims that Defendants denied him access to the medication, and in so doing, violated his civil rights. (See id.)

On June 1, 2016, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Green's complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 41(b). (See Defs.' Mot. (Doc. No. 34).) On June 21, 2016, the magistrate judge assigned to this case, the Honorable Peggy Kuo, reminded Green that if he failed to comply with his discovery obligations by July 20, 2016, she would recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (See Min. Entry 6/21/16 (Doc. No. 38).)

On March 15, 2017, Judge Kuo issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), a copy of which was mailed to Green and his wife via Federal Express, recommending that Green's action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b). (See R&R (Doc. No. 52).) Judge Kuo reminded the parties that, pursuant to Rule 72(b), any objections to the R&R must be filed by March 30, 2017. (R&R at 14.) The date to file objections has passed, and no party has filed any objection.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007).

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Green's action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment, mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order and the accompanying judgment to plaintiff Warren Green, pro se, note the mailing on the docket, and close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Roslynn R . Mauskopf

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF

United States District Judge Dated: Brooklyn, New York

March 31, 2017


Summaries of

Green v. Rodgers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 31, 2017
15-CV-2260 (RRM) (PK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Green v. Rodgers

Case Details

Full title:WARREN GREEN, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER RODGERS and DEPUTY LEMON, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 31, 2017

Citations

15-CV-2260 (RRM) (PK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2017)

Citing Cases

Scruggs v. Gribble

Julian, L. E. Gribble and B. H. Hooker, all filed herein on January 3, 1927, together with the plaintiff's…

Scruggs v. Gribble

In a suit against several defendants, in the copy designated for service on defendant "A," the sheriff's…