From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. New Trend Development Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 2, 1984
456 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-364.

October 2, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Murray Goldman, J.

Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick, Schneider Mager and Bradford J. Beilly and Joseph J. Huss, Hollywood, for appellant.

Samuel S. Sorota, Smith Mandler, Patricia M. Silver and Jonathan A. Heller, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.


The summary final judgment entered in favor of the defendants-appellees on the sole ground that Section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1977), rendered unenforceable the agreement sued upon is reversed upon a holding that the agreement, under which the appellant released his existing right to purchase from the appellees certain specified condominium apartments in consideration for the appellees' promise to enter into a contract to sell other specified condominium apartments to the appellant, is not an agreement for the sale of real property and thus not within the statute of frauds.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Green v. New Trend Development Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 2, 1984
456 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Green v. New Trend Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MILTON GREEN, APPELLANT, v. NEW TREND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND LEE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 2, 1984

Citations

456 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Wharfside at Boca Pointe, Inc. v. Superior Bank

According to Wharfside, the Purchase Agreement herein did not involve the transfer of title, since title to…

Dana v. Turnberry Towers Corp.

Affirmed. See Robbie v. City of Miami, 469 So.2d 1384 (Fla. 1985); Green v. New Trend Dev. Corp., 456 So.2d…