From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

June, 1936.


Judgment dismissing complaint at the close of plaintiff's case reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Defendant owed plaintiff — an invitee — a duty of reasonable care. ( Vaughan v. Transit Development Co., 222 N.Y. 79; Hudson v. Church of Holy Trinity, 250 id. 513.) While defendant was subject to no statutory duty to keep the vestibule and stairway lighted, it was for the jury to say whether defendant was negligent and the plaintiff free from contributory negligence. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to affirm.


Summaries of

Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET GREEN, Appellant, v. CHURCH OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 757 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Kiernan v. Roman Catholic Church

On the contrary, such stairs are most common with respect to churches other than those whose vestibules are…

Grant v. United States

Here, as well as in the Meiers case just cited, the defendant not only should have anticipated the use of the…