From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green v. Christus Spohn Health Sys.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
May 11, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-064 (S.D. Tex. May. 11, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-064

05-11-2018

BILLY T. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 8). On May 10, 2018, Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (D.E. 10), which does not reference his earlier complaint (D.E. 1). "An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders it of no legal effect unless the amended complaint specifically refers to and adopts or incorporates by reference the earlier pleading." King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc., 759 F.2d 504, 508 (5th Cir.1985)). A Rule 12(b)(6) motion addressed to a superseded complaint is moot. See generally, Van Deelen v. Cain, 628 F. App'x 891, 900 (5th Cir. 2015) (noting that prior motions to dismiss had been mooted by prior amended complaints). See also, Maxim Integrated Prod., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. SA-14-CV-1030-XR, 2015 WL 10990119, at *1 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2015) (citing Merritt v. Fogel, 349 F. App'x 742, 745 (3d Cir. 2009)). Consequently, the Court TERMINATES AS MOOT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 8).

ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2018.

/s/_________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Green v. Christus Spohn Health Sys.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
May 11, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-064 (S.D. Tex. May. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Green v. Christus Spohn Health Sys.

Case Details

Full title:BILLY T. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: May 11, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-064 (S.D. Tex. May. 11, 2018)