From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Green et al., v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Jul 31, 1942
151 Fla. 23 (Fla. 1942)

Opinion

July 7, 1942 Rehearing Denied July 31, 1942

An appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Ben C. Willard, Judge.

Arthur S. Friedman, for appellant.

J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, Millard B. Conklin, Assistant Attorney General, Woodrow M. Melvin, Special Assistant Attorney General, Robert R. Taylor, County Solicitor, Glenn C. Mincer, Assistant County Solicitor, for appellee.


This appeal is from a conviction on a charge of operating a gambling house in violation of Section 7657, Compiled General Laws of 1927. The record and the briefs have been examined. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is challenged but we find no reversible error on this or any other point. The main questions relied on for reversal are substantially the same as those with which we were confronted in Lou Church and J.D. Sawyer v. State of Florida, decided this date. The judgment appealed from is accordingly affirmed on authority of that case.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Green et al., v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Jul 31, 1942
151 Fla. 23 (Fla. 1942)
Case details for

Green et al., v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL GREEN and HAROLD PENROSE, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Jul 31, 1942

Citations

151 Fla. 23 (Fla. 1942)
9 So. 2d 167

Citing Cases

Stahl v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of Church v. State, 151 Fla. 24, 9 So.2d 164; Green Penrose v. State, 151…

Hanson v. State

The second question urged by appellants is that the arrest, search and seizure of the defendants was…