From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Great Lakes Steel Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 12, 1955
220 F.2d 751 (6th Cir. 1955)

Opinion

No. 12189.

February 12, 1955.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan; Lederle, Judge.

Hill, Essery, Lewis Andrews, James McEvoy, Jr., and Harry D. Fenske, Detroit, Mich. (argued by Edward T. Goodrich, Detroit, Mich.), for appellant.

Herbert Brownell, Jr., Atty. Gen., Fred W. Kaess, Detroit, Mich., E.M. Reidy, I.C.C., Washington, D.C., Willis T. Pierson, Cleveland, Ohio, E.A. Kaier, Philadelphia, Pa., Frank H. Cole, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, and Dyer, Angell Meek, Detroit, Mich. (argued by Ellis v. Gregory, Washington, D.C., for Interstate Comm. Comn. and by Frank H. Cole, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Railroads) for appellees.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;

And it appearing that the District Court afforded argument and reargument upon the case and carefully considered the record as a whole;

And it appearing that upon the record considered as a whole substantial evidence exists supporting the order of the Commission;

And it appearing that the District Court properly applied the applicable law. Cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L. Ed. 456:

It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court, 115 F. Supp. 31, be and it hereby is affirmed.


Summaries of

Great Lakes Steel Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 12, 1955
220 F.2d 751 (6th Cir. 1955)
Case details for

Great Lakes Steel Corporation v. United States

Case Details

Full title:GREAT LAKES STEEL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 1955

Citations

220 F.2d 751 (6th Cir. 1955)

Citing Cases

General Motors Corporation v. United States

Unless the Commission's findings were contrary to law, were arbitrary or capricious, or were unsupported by…

General Motors Corporation v. United States

As we see it, our function is limited to a determination whether the order of the Commission was supported by…