From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gray v. Reuther

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 17, 1952
201 F.2d 54 (6th Cir. 1952)

Opinion

No. 11544.

December 17, 1952.

Davidow Davidow, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Harold A. Cranefield and Zwerdling Zwerdling, Detroit, Mich., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.


This appeal from dismissal by the district court of the complaint on motion of appellees came on to be heard;

And the record and the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys having been duly considered, this court is of opinion that the action of the District Judge in dismissing the complaint was well grounded, for the reasons stated in his succinct opinion to the effect that the complaint failed to state a class action, cf. Giordano v. Radio Corporation of America, 3 Cir., 183 F.2d 558, and for the further reason that the local union, which was not joined as a party to the suit, is an indispensable party; and, if joined as a party defendant, such joining would result in defeating jurisdiction for lack of diversity of citizenship;

And, moreover, it appears that the appellant herein has failed to exhaust his remedies within the labor organization, as required by the Union Constitution. See Reigel v. Harrison, 6 Cir., 157 F.2d 140.

Accordingly, the order of the district court granting appellees' motion to dismiss the action is affirmed.


Summaries of

Gray v. Reuther

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 17, 1952
201 F.2d 54 (6th Cir. 1952)
Case details for

Gray v. Reuther

Case Details

Full title:GRAY v. REUTHER et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 1952

Citations

201 F.2d 54 (6th Cir. 1952)

Citing Cases

Underwood v. Maloney

An injunction against Maloney individually or against Wharton individually could not validly preclude the…

Rose v. Giamatti

Rose also relies upon two cases involving labor unions, Underwood v. Maloney, 256 F.2d 334 (3d Cir. 1958),…