From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graves v. Salazar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2011
Case No. EDCV 10-2013-DMG (OP) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2011)

Summary

finding no constitutional error in imposing upper term based on terms of the plea agreement

Summary of this case from Lloyd v. Gonzalez

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 10-2013-DMG (OP)

12-29-2011

MICHAEL STANDON GRAVES, Petitioner, v. JOHN F. SALAZAR, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Adopting Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

________________________

DOLLY M. GEE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Graves v. Salazar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 29, 2011
Case No. EDCV 10-2013-DMG (OP) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2011)

finding no constitutional error in imposing upper term based on terms of the plea agreement

Summary of this case from Lloyd v. Gonzalez
Case details for

Graves v. Salazar

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL STANDON GRAVES, Petitioner, v. JOHN F. SALAZAR, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 29, 2011

Citations

Case No. EDCV 10-2013-DMG (OP) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2011)

Citing Cases

Zepeda v. Beard

"[I]mposing the upper term based on the agreed-on terms of a plea bargain does not run afoul of Apprendi."…

Williams v. Lewis

Furthermore, even without the change in the state law, Petitioner's sentence would not have run afoul of…