From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graves v. Reynolds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv91 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv91

06-23-2019

SCOTT W. GRAVES v. JONATHAN REYNOLDS, ET AL.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Scott W. Graves, an inmate at the Hughes Unit, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

So ORDERED and SIGNED June 23, 2019.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Graves v. Reynolds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jun 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv91 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Graves v. Reynolds

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT W. GRAVES v. JONATHAN REYNOLDS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 23, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv91 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 23, 2019)

Citing Cases

McCracken v. Smathers

We think that the rule as herein laid down is fully in accord with those decisions, and is sustained by the…

Graves v. Name Unknown #1

Graves is well aware of this restriction on his ability to proceed without prepaying the filing fee because…