From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grant v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 17, 1914
140 P. 1196 (Okla. Crim. App. 1914)

Opinion

No. A-1972.

Opinion Filed March 17, 1914.

Appeal from District Court, Pontotoc County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge.

T.W. Grant was convicted of embezzlement, and appeals. Reversed.

C.C. Williams, C.F. Green, and J.F. McKeel, for plaintiff in error.

C.J. Davenport, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The plaintiff in error, T.W. Grant, was convicted at the November, 1912, term of the district court of Pontotoc county on a charge of embezzlement, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of one year. We have carefully read the record in this case and to our minds there is no offense disclosed by the proof and also no question of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. The plaintiff in error was prosecuted for embezzlement upon the theory that as agent of one Starritt he embezzled the proceeds of certain ties. The relation of principal and agent did not exist. The facts clearly disclose the relation of debtor and creditor instead, and the case must therefore fall. We are of the opinion that a statement of the facts and an elaborate discussion of the questions involved would serve no good purpose. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss.


Summaries of

Grant v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 17, 1914
140 P. 1196 (Okla. Crim. App. 1914)
Case details for

Grant v. State

Case Details

Full title:T.V. GRANT v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 17, 1914

Citations

140 P. 1196 (Okla. Crim. App. 1914)
10 Okla. Crim. 682

Citing Cases

State v. Wilson

"`* * * a mere mental state of uncommunicated consent or acquiescence on the part of a bystander, where a…

State v. Gonzales

Some aiding, abetting or actual encouragement on his part is essential." State v. Grant, 26 Idaho 189, at…