From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grano v. RKI Expl. & Prod., LLC

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 4, 2019
No. A-1-CA-37329 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2019)

Opinion

No. A-1-CA-37329

03-04-2019

MARC GRANO, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ROBERTO MAGDALENO, and LAURA CEJA, Individually and as Parent and Guardian of CHRISTIAN ANDRADE CEJA AND BRANDON ANDRADE CEJA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RKI EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION, LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

Wray & Girard, PC Katherine Wray Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Chapman and Priest, P.C. Ada B. Priest Mitchell J. Freedman Albuquerque, NM Holland & Hart LLP Larry J. Montaño Julia Broggi Santa Fe, NM for Appellee


This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this electronic decision may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Supreme Court. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY
Sarah C. Backus, District Judge Wray & Girard, PC
Katherine Wray
Albuquerque, NM for Appellant Chapman and Priest, P.C.
Ada B. Priest
Mitchell J. Freedman
Albuquerque, NM Holland & Hart LLP
Larry J. Montaño
Julia Broggi
Santa Fe, NM for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Judge. {1} Plaintiffs are appealing from a judgment, entered after a jury verdict, dismissing Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant RKI Exploration and Production, LLC. [RP 3678, 4046] We issued a calendar notice proposing to dismiss for lack of a final order. Plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in opposition, which we find unpersuasive. Accordingly, we dismiss. {2} "[O]ur appellate jurisdiction is limited to review of 'any final judgment or decision, any interlocutory order or decision which practically disposes of the merits of the action, or any final order after entry of judgment which affects substantial rights.' " Capco Acquisub, Inc. v. Greka Energy Corp., 2007-NMCA-011, ¶ 17, 140 N.M. 920, 149 P.3d 1017 (alteration, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted). An appellate court does not have jurisdiction when a final judgment has not been entered. See, e.g., State v. Griego, 2004-NMCA-107, ¶ 22, 136 N.M. 272, 96 P.3d 1192 (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction when no final judgment had been entered); State v. Garcia, 1983-NMCA-017, ¶¶ 29-30, 99 N.M. 466, 659 P.2d 918 (same). When an appellate court does not have jurisdiction, it must dismiss. See Thornton v. Gamble, 1984-NMCA-093, ¶ 15, 101 N.M. 764, 688 P.2d 1268. {3} As indicated, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from a July 31, 2017, judgment, entered after a jury verdict, dismissing Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant RKI Exploration and Production, LLC. [RP 3678, 4046] However, as the district court noted in its order denying a motion for summary judgment brought by other Defendants, there are pending cross-claims in this case. [RP 4153] Accordingly, our calendar notice proposed to hold that the July 31, 2017 judgment and subsequent order denying a new trial are not considered final pursuant to Rule 1-054(B) NMRA. {4} Plaintiffs argue that the cross-claims are indemnification claims for reimbursement of attorney fees, and therefore should not affect finality. [MIO 12] However, our Supreme Court has held that attorney fees in an indemnification action are equivalent to damages and that a pending fees claim in such cases deem any appeal to be premature. See Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Straus, 1993-NMSC-058, ¶¶ 10-11, 116 N.M. 412, 863 P.2d 447. We also are not persuaded by Plaintiffs' claim that the district court implicitly certified finality, because it chose to hold off addressing the cross-claims until this appeal was resolved. [MIO 12] There is no indication that the district court actually addressed the Rule 1-054(B) issue on the merits. In light of our analysis, we do not deem it necessary to address arguments made with respect to independent grounds for rendering this matter non-final. [MIO 13] {5} For the reasons set forth above, we dismiss the appeal.

{6} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge /s/ _________
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge


Summaries of

Grano v. RKI Expl. & Prod., LLC

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 4, 2019
No. A-1-CA-37329 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Grano v. RKI Expl. & Prod., LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARC GRANO, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF ROBERTO MAGDALENO…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Mar 4, 2019

Citations

No. A-1-CA-37329 (N.M. Ct. App. Mar. 4, 2019)