From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grandinetti v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1989
155 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 30, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


In its special verdict, the jury awarded plaintiff $500,000 for his pain and suffering and $500,000 for his loss of enjoyment of life, pursuant to the trial court's charge that it could award damages for loss of enjoyment of life separately from any award of damages for pain and suffering.

The Court of Appeals has since held that such an instruction should not be given since loss of enjoyment of life is not a separate element of damages deserving a distinct award but is, instead, only a factor to be considered by the jury in assessing damages for conscious pain and suffering. (McDougald v Garber, 73 N.Y.2d 246; Nussbaum v Gibstein, 73 N.Y.2d 912; see also, Kaufman v Hodinka, 151 A.D.2d 398.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Ross and Carro, JJ.


Summaries of

Grandinetti v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1989
155 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Grandinetti v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:DOMINICK GRANDINETTI et al., Respondents, v. DAVID ROSE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 378 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Viscomi v. S.S. Kresge Co., K-Mart Discount

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to…

Murtagh v. City of New York

In light of the severity of plaintiff's injuries, his persistent disability and economic loss, the jury's…