Summary
In Grandi v. United States, 262 F. 123, 124, the indictment charged the defendant with the receipt and possession of goods knowing they had been stolen from part of a shipment in interstate commerce, but failed to charge that the goods were in fact so stolen. A motion to quash had been denied, on the ground that the defendant could not have been misled to his prejudice.
Summary of this case from Hagner v. United StatesOpinion
No. 4941.
October 7, 1927.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; Harry B. Anderson, Judge.
Galella Stanton, of Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff in error.
Lindsay B. Phillips, U.S. Atty., of Memphis, Tenn.
Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.