From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grand Trunk W. Railroad v. Roddy

U.S.
Oct 3, 2005
546 U.S. 928 (2005)

Summary

In Railroad v. Roddy, 85 Tenn. 400, 5 S.W. 286, the rule of the common law, applied in many prior Tennessee cases, was declared, "that in actions for damages for personal torts it is within the strict province of the jury to estimate the extent of the injury and assess the damage, and that unless there is a manifest abuse of this trust, such as to indicate passion, prejudice, partiality, or unaccountable caprice or corruption, the trial judge ought not to interfere."

Summary of this case from Goebel v. Fleming

Opinion

No. 05-106.

October 3, 2005.


Certiorari Denied

C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of Airline Industrial Relations Conference et al. for leave to file a brief as amid curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 395 F. 3d 318.


Summaries of

Grand Trunk W. Railroad v. Roddy

U.S.
Oct 3, 2005
546 U.S. 928 (2005)

In Railroad v. Roddy, 85 Tenn. 400, 5 S.W. 286, the rule of the common law, applied in many prior Tennessee cases, was declared, "that in actions for damages for personal torts it is within the strict province of the jury to estimate the extent of the injury and assess the damage, and that unless there is a manifest abuse of this trust, such as to indicate passion, prejudice, partiality, or unaccountable caprice or corruption, the trial judge ought not to interfere."

Summary of this case from Goebel v. Fleming
Case details for

Grand Trunk W. Railroad v. Roddy

Case Details

Full title:GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD INC. ET AL. v. RODDY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

Citations

546 U.S. 928 (2005)
126 S. Ct. 399

Citing Cases

Rhoton v. Burton

The older cases in Tennessee, as well as respectable authority in other states, hold in actions for damages…

Goebel v. Fleming

Under this rule the contribution of the injuries to the aggravation of the diseases was an element of damage,…