From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. King

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 14, 2009
02 Civ. 5068 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2009)

Opinion

02 Civ. 5068 (JFK).

January 14, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


In a letter dated November 10, 2008, Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider or, alternatively, clarify its October 14, 2008, order (the "Order"). Specifically, Plaintiff asks whether the Order (1) addressed the merits of Plaintiff's antitrust claim by precluding a claim based a rule of reason standard, and (2) overruled Magistrate Judge Eaton's subsequent discovery rulings. The Order does not preclude an antitrust claim based on a rule of reason standard, nor does it overrule Magistrate Judge Eaton's subsequent discovery rulings.

Plaintiff does not ask the Court to reconsider or clarify the Order to the extent it ruled on the scope of discovery.

Having clarified the Order, the Court finds that a pre-motion conference for a motion to reconsider the Order is unnecessary.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. King

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 14, 2009
02 Civ. 5068 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2009)
Case details for

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd. v. King

Case Details

Full title:GRAND RIVER ENTERPRISES SIX NATIONS, LTD., Plaintiff, v. TROY KING, et…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 14, 2009

Citations

02 Civ. 5068 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

Tiger Capital, LLC v. PHL Variable Ins. Co.

At the same time, "[w]hile failure to provide a privilege log in a timely manner may result in a waiver,…

New York v. Grand River Enters. Six Nations, Ltd.

Plaintiff further contends no privilege log was required until Plaintiff's non-privilege objections to…