holding that a knowing misappropriation may be established by "evidence clearly and convincingly demonstrates that [respondent] knew the invasion was a likely result of his conduct" and that "`willful blindness satisfies requirement of knowledge'"
Summary of this case from Matter of FreimarkNo. 86-884.
April 27, 1987, October TERM, 1986.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 797 F. 2d 432.
holding that a knowing misappropriation may be established by "evidence clearly and convincingly demonstrates that [respondent] knew the invasion was a likely result of his conduct" and that "`willful blindness satisfies requirement of knowledge'"
Summary of this case from Matter of Freimarkfinding it unnecessary to decide whether Minnesota law "permits application of the clean hands doctrine, traditionally an equitable defense, in an action at law for money damages"
Summary of this case from Bieter Co. v. BlomquistFull title:GRAMENOS v. JEWEL COS., INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 27, 1987
Contrary to Plaintiff's allegation, the state may prosecute against the wishes of witnesses. Gramenos v.…
Police Retirement Sys. v. Midwest Inv.Since the court's decision in Superior Oil, the Eighth Circuit has consistently held that where all the…