From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gradsky v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 28, 1967
373 F.2d 711 (5th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 23052.

February 28, 1967.

W. Thomas Margetts, III, Herbert Brownell, Lord, Day Lord, New York City, James Lee Rankin, Jr., New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Mahlon M. Frankhauser, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., William A. Meadows, Jr., U.S. Atty., Lloyd G. Bates, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., David B. Bliss, Sp. Counsel, P. Dennis Belman, Atty., Div. of Trading and Markets, S.E.C., Washington, D.C., of counsel, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BELL and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion for new trial based on allegedly newly discovered evidence following the judgment of conviction and sentence of Harold Gradsky, which is the subject of the appeal decided by this court today in Number 23,783, 373 F.2d 706.

This appeal is mooted by reason of the action of this court in reversing Gradsky's conviction on the merits of the direct appeal. It, therefore, becomes unnecessary for us to do more than dismiss the appeal for mootness.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Gradsky v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 28, 1967
373 F.2d 711 (5th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Gradsky v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Harold GRADSKY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 1967

Citations

373 F.2d 711 (5th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Muir v. United States

TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This is a companion case to the appeal of Gradsky v. United States, 5 Cir., 373 F.2d…