From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grace v. Myers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 18, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-300-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 18, 2015)

Summary

In Grace, however, it is evident that the improperly-served defendant received notice of the pending litigation because he provided an affidavit that the defendants submitted to the Court, confirming that long-arm service had not been sent to his current address. Grace, 2015 WL 4939893 at *4.

Summary of this case from Kelly v. Arch Ins. Co.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-300-JWD-RLB

08-18-2015

DEVANTE GRACE v. DONALD MYERS, ET AL.


OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report dated July 30, 2015, to which no objection was filed:

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, including the embedded Rule 11 motion, is DENIED.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on August 18, 2015.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Grace v. Myers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 18, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-300-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 18, 2015)

In Grace, however, it is evident that the improperly-served defendant received notice of the pending litigation because he provided an affidavit that the defendants submitted to the Court, confirming that long-arm service had not been sent to his current address. Grace, 2015 WL 4939893 at *4.

Summary of this case from Kelly v. Arch Ins. Co.
Case details for

Grace v. Myers

Case Details

Full title:DEVANTE GRACE v. DONALD MYERS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 18, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-300-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Aug. 18, 2015)

Citing Cases

Kelly v. Arch Ins. Co.

Defendants cite a recent decision from this Court, in which the Court concluded that a defendant was not…

United States v. Ins. Co. of Pa.

Based on the evidence before the court, it appears that the complaint and summons were sent to an incorrect…