From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grabner v. Jensen

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jul 24, 2009
09-cv-461-slc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 24, 2009)

Opinion

09-cv-461-slc.

July 24, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff Guy Grabner, a prisoner at the Oconto County jail in Oconto, Wisconsin, has submitted a proposed complaint. He requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. From the affidavit of indigency accompanying his complaint, it appears that plaintiff presently has no means with which to pay an initial partial payment of the $350 filing fee. However, plaintiff should be aware that he is obligated to pay the $350 filing fee, even if this court determines that he will not be permitted to proceed with his complaint in forma pauperis and even if he does not presently have funds with which to pay the fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). His account will be monitored and the fee must be taken in monthly installments when the funds exist.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Guy Grabner's complaint is taken under advisement. As soon as the court's calendar permits, plaintiff's complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) to determine whether the case must be dismissed either because the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. Plaintiff will be notified promptly when such a decision has been made.

Further, the Clerk of Court is requested to insure that the court's financial records reflect that plaintiff owes the $350 fee for filing this case, in accordance with the requirements of the Prison Litigation Reform Act.


Summaries of

Grabner v. Jensen

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jul 24, 2009
09-cv-461-slc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 24, 2009)
Case details for

Grabner v. Jensen

Case Details

Full title:GUY GRABNER, Plaintiff, v. MIKE JENSEN, Sheriff and Oconto Falls Police…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jul 24, 2009

Citations

09-cv-461-slc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 24, 2009)

Citing Cases

Robb v. City of Milwaukee

Hughes v. Fond du Lac, 73 Wis. 380, 41 N.W. 407, held the city liable for leaving a large roller being used…

Grinde v. Watertown

The rule to that effect is stated in Harper v. Milwaukee, 30 Wis. 365, 373, and Bruhnke v. La Crosse, 155…