From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. IAV Med. Supply, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 27, 2013
11-CV-4261 (ARR) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

11-CV-4261 (ARR) (RER)

02-27-2013

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and GEICO CASUALTY CO., Plaintiffs, v. IAV MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC., VADIM IZRAILOV, SERGEY AKOPYAN, NEW CAPITAL SUPPLY, INC., ILYA TAMAYEFF, POWER SUPPLY, INC., and RUBEN LEVY, the "Retail Defendants," and VZ GROUP, INC., VADIM ZALOGIN, FRAZIER TRADING COMPANY, INC., VLADISLAV AGUVAYEV, GLOBAL BEST DEAL, INC., SERGEY MEZKULA, MIKOS TRADING, INC., JOHN DOE "1", (Identity presently unknown, but intended to be the owner of MIKOS Trading, Inc.) MIKS TRADING, INC., JOHN DOE "2", (Identity presently unknown, but intended to be the owner of MIKS Trading, Inc.) NEW STEP SERVICES, INC., JOHN DOE "3", (Identity presently unknown, but intended to be the owner of New Step Services, Inc.), the "Wholesale Defendants," Defendants.


NOT FOR ELECTRONIC

OR PRINT PUBLICATION


ORDER

ROSS, United States District Judge:

The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated February 8, 2013, from the Honorable Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); accord Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-1930682 (CBA) (LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

I therefore grant Plaintiffs' motions for default judgment. The Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment that Wholesale Defendants VZ Group. Inc.; Vadim Zalogin; Frazier Trading Company, Inc.; Vladislav Aguvayev; Global Best Deal, Inc.; Sergey Mezkula; MIKOS Trading, Inc.; MIKS Trading, Inc.; and New Step Services, Inc. are liable for aiding and abetting fraud, and that Retail Defendants Power Supply, Inc. and Ruben Levy are liable for common law fraud and unjust enrichment.

With regards to damages, Plaintiffs shall be awarded:

(1) $400,112.59 in compensatory damages and $113,176.60 in prejudgment interest, with $98.66 per diem from February 9, 2012, until the date of entry of judgment, against defendants VZ Group, Inc.; Vadim Zalogin, Frazier Trading Company, Inc.; Vladislav Aguvayev; Global Best Deal, Inc.; Sergey Mezkula, MIKOS Trading, Inc.; MIKS Trading, Inc.; and New Step Services, Inc., jointly and severally, for their participation in the IAV Scheme;
(2) $56,194.55 in compensatory damages and $10,005.20 in prejudgment interest, with $13.86 per diem from February 9, 2012, until the date of entry of judgment, against defendants VZ Group, Inc. and Vadim Zalogin, jointly and severally, for their participation in the New Capital Scheme;
(3) $37,492.23 in compensatory damages and $6,879.70 in prejudgment interest, with $9.24 per diem from February 9, 2012, until the date of entry of judgment, against defendants Power Supply, Inc.; Ruben Levy; VZ Group, Inc.; and Vadim Zalogin, jointly and severally, for their participation in the Power Supply Scheme.

In addition, the Clerk of Court shall enter a declaratory judgment that Plaintiffs are neither obligated to pay nor are liable for the outstanding claims submitted by Retail Defendant Power Supply, Inc.

SO ORDERED.

_________

Allyne R. Ross

United States District Judge
Dated: February 27, 2013

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. IAV Med. Supply, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 27, 2013
11-CV-4261 (ARR) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. IAV Med. Supply, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

11-CV-4261 (ARR) (RER) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Serrano v. Palacios

As a result, “‘the complaint must: (1) specify the statements that the plaintiff contends were fraudulent,…