From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Government Personnel Mut. Life Ins. v. Kaye

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 22, 1978
584 F.2d 738 (5th Cir. 1978)

Opinion

No. 78-2160. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

November 22, 1978.

Blake H. Bailey, Henderson, Tex., for defendant-cross-plaintiff, appellant.

Dean W. Turner, Henderson, Tex., James A. O'Toole, Warren, Mich., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Before THORNBERRY, GODBOLD and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.



We affirm the judgment appealed from for the reasons given in the District Court's Order, which we attach here as an appendix. We note that Michigan courts would give full effect to the original divorce decree and property settlement in a subsequent interpleader action. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Irvine, 338 Mich. 18, 61 N.W.2d 14 (1953), and that a Texas state court would also enforce the original decree. McElreath v. McElreath, 162 Tex. 190, 345 S.W.2d 722 (1961).

APPENDIX

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division

No. TY-77-90-CA

ORDER

28 U.S.C. § 1738 Hazen Research, Inc. v. Omega Materials, Inc., 497 F.2d 151 153 28 U.S.C. § 1738 Hampton v. McConnell, 4 L.Ed. 378 Williams v. State of North Carolina, 317 U.S. 287 293-294 63 S.Ct. 207 87 L.Ed. 279 Holm v. Shilensky, 388 F.2d 54 56 subsequent See Northeastern Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Cisneros, 392 F.2d 198 200 Northeastern Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Cisneros, 260 F. Supp. 675 see Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Irvine, 338 Mich. 18 61 N.W.2d 14 subsequent STEGER, District Judge. This is an interpleader action in which each Defendant claims the interplead life insurance benefits, and seeks a summary judgment to that effect. The Court having considered the stipulated facts, briefs of counsel, and the applicable law in this area, is of the opinion that the motion for summary judgment of Grace M. Krzewicki should be denied and the motion for summary judgment of Edward J. Kaye, Administrator of the Estate of Leon V. Kaye, a/k/a Leon V. Krzewicki, should be granted. The Court bases its holding on the following: (1) Under "federal courts are required to give full effect to the final judgments of state courts, . . ." , (5th Cir. 1974). More specifically, under , "a final decree of divorce rendered in one state `should have the same credit, validity and effect, in every other court in the United States, which it had in the State where it was pronounced,' 16 U.S. (3 Wheat.) 234, 235, (1818) (Marshall, C. J.), as long as the jurisdictional facts, including domicile are validly established whenever the decree is questioned. , , , (1942)." , (2d Cir. 1968). (2) A Michigan state court which had jurisdiction over the parties granted a Default Judgment of Divorce to Leon V. Kaye, a/k/a Leon V. Krzewicki, deceased, and Grace M. Krzewicki on or about April 29, 1974, which Judgment provided that the proceeds of any policies of life insurance on Leon V. Kaye, a/k/a Leon V. Krzewicki, would become payable to such beneficiary as Leon Kaye should affirmatively designate. Subsequent to said Divorce Judgment Leon V. Kaye failed to affirmatively designate anyone as his beneficiary. (3) Under Michigan law, Leon V. Kaye was required to take positive affirmative action to redesignate his divorced wife as the beneficiary of his life insurance policies to their divorce in order to give her such status. , (6th Cir. 1968). Even when the insured husband makes no effort to strike the divorced wife's name as the designated beneficiary, but instead permits her to continue as beneficiary of record after the divorce, the ex-wife's interest in the policies is terminated absent positive affirmative action of the husband to redesignate her as beneficiary. (E.D.Mich. 1966); , (1953). When, as in the instant case, the insured former husband fails to affirmatively designate his ex-wife as the beneficiary of his life insurance policies to a divorce, his policies automatically become payable to his estate upon his death. M.S.A. § 25.131, Compiled Laws Michigan, 1948, § 552.101. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Grace M. Krzewicki is DENIED, and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Edward J. Kaye be, and the same is hereby GRANTED, and it is further ORDERED that Edward J. Kaye, Administrator of the Estate of Leon V. Kaye, a/k/a Leon V. Krzewicki recover the funds interplead in the Registry of the Court in the amount of $13,364.94. SIGNED this 29th day of March, 1978.


Summaries of

Government Personnel Mut. Life Ins. v. Kaye

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 22, 1978
584 F.2d 738 (5th Cir. 1978)
Case details for

Government Personnel Mut. Life Ins. v. Kaye

Case Details

Full title:GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 22, 1978

Citations

584 F.2d 738 (5th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Wilson

Furthermore, there is a presumption that a judgment is valid and the burden rests heavily upon the assailant…

Rollins v. Dwyer

Section 1738 requires federal or state courts to give to a state court judgment only the same effect that it…