From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gould v. Mellick and Sexton

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 20, 2001
789 A.2d 990 (Conn. 2001)

Opinion

Decided December 20, 2001


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 542 (AC 20228/AC 20230), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked authority to render summary judgment because: (1) the case was complex; and (2) there were disputed questions of facts?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16659.

David J. Robertson, in support of the petition.

Steven H. Solomson, Julia B. Morris, Robert B. Cohen and James Stedronsky, in opposition.


Summaries of

Gould v. Mellick and Sexton

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 20, 2001
789 A.2d 990 (Conn. 2001)
Case details for

Gould v. Mellick and Sexton

Case Details

Full title:ROGER GOULD ET AL. v. MELLICK AND SEXTON NORMAN KEITH ET AL. v. MELLICK…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 20, 2001

Citations

789 A.2d 990 (Conn. 2001)
789 A.2d 990

Citing Cases

Gould v. Mellick Sexton

Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court. See Gould v. Mellick Sexton, 259 Conn. 902, 789…

Pelletier v. Sordoni/Skanska Construction Co.

Furthermore, we note that we have, in Gould, certified for further review the question of whether "the…