From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gottesman v. Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1940
260 App. Div. 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

November 12, 1940.


In an action for breach of contract, order granting defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint for rescission of the contract, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the time of plaintiff to serve said amended complaint is extended until ten days after the entry of the order hereon. The alleged breach of the contract consists of various acts of unfair competition, but there is no allegation that defendant agreed to refrain from unfair competition. A copy of the contract is not annexed to the complaint and no provision of the contract upon which liability is based is pleaded. Therefore, the complaint fails to state a cause of action. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gottesman v. Glass

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 12, 1940
260 App. Div. 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Gottesman v. Glass

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP A. GOTTESMAN, Appellant, v. DAVID GLASS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1940

Citations

260 App. Div. 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Citing Cases

Chrysler Capital Corp. v. Hilltop Egg Farms

It follows that Supreme Court improperly directed summary judgment in plaintiff's favor. Moreover, even…