From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gotbetter v. Dow Jones Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 1999
259 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Summary

In Gotbetter, the Appellate Division upheld the Supreme Court's dismissal of a plaintiff's defamation claim based on a defendant's statement that a previous suit was "baseless."

Summary of this case from Evunp Holdings LLC v. Jacob Fryman, Jfurti LLC

Opinion

March 16, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.).


Defendants wrote and published an article about a Federal lawsuit commenced by plaintiff against Victoria's Secret, detailing the circumstances of that action and several similar frivolous lawsuits commenced by plaintiff, who then commenced the instant action against these defendants alleging libel per se. The court correctly granted defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint on the ground that there is nothing in the complained of article that defames plaintiff in his trade, business or profession as alleged in the complaint ( see, Aronson v. Wiersma, 65 N.Y.2d 592, 594).

The report in the article that Victoria's Secret's counsel called plaintiff's suit "baseless" is not actionable because the cited statement is merely an opinion ( Immuno AG. v. Moor-Jankowski, 77 N.Y.2d 235, 256, cert denied 500 U.S. 954). Even if factual, however, the statement would be impregnable as against a defamation claim, the District Court in the course of dismissing plaintiff's complaint in the Victoria's Secret lawsuit and imposing sanctions of $5000, having made special note of "the flagrant lack of merit to Plaintiffs' RICO claims, the likelihood that [his] action was filed for improper purposes, and the substantial burden this litigation has imposed on Defendants" ( Katzman v. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, 167 FRD 649, 661, affd 113 F.3d 1229).

Plaintiff argues that defendants' reporting was not fair and balanced, but this Court has observed that "[w]hether or not a particular article constitutes unbalanced reporting is essentially a matter involving editorial judgment and is not actionable" ( Sprecher v. Dow Jones Co., 88 A.D.2d 550, 551, affd 58 N.Y.2d 862).

Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Gotbetter v. Dow Jones Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 16, 1999
259 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

In Gotbetter, the Appellate Division upheld the Supreme Court's dismissal of a plaintiff's defamation claim based on a defendant's statement that a previous suit was "baseless."

Summary of this case from Evunp Holdings LLC v. Jacob Fryman, Jfurti LLC
Case details for

Gotbetter v. Dow Jones Company

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD GOTBETTER, Appellant, v. DOW JONES COMPANY, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 16, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 335 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 43

Citing Cases

Sprecher v. Thibodeau

As to the attorney comments, comments made to the media by a party's attorney regarding an ongoing lawsuit…

Missy Chbve Lapine v. Jerry Seinfeld

As statements of opinion about the lack of merit of plaintiff s claims, they are not actionable. ( See…