From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gosselin v. National Aviation Underwriters

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 19, 1976
365 A.2d 194 (N.J. 1976)

Opinion

Argued November 17, 1975 —

Decided October 19, 1976.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Richard D. Catenacci argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant ( Messrs. McElroy, Connell, Foley Geiser, attorneys); Mr. Catenacci on the brief.

Mr. Frank L. Brunetti argued the cause for defendant-respondent ( Messrs. Lamb, Hutchinson, Chappell, Ryan Hartung, attorneys); Mr. Brunetti on the brief.


Under the Supplemental Findings of Fact by the trial judge rendered pursuant to our special order of remand it must be concluded that the defendant has established a case of material misrepresentation of fact by plaintiff warranting a judgment of rescission of the policy. Accordingly the judgment of the Appellate Division is

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Gosselin v. National Aviation Underwriters

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 19, 1976
365 A.2d 194 (N.J. 1976)
Case details for

Gosselin v. National Aviation Underwriters

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE GOSSELIN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NATIONAL AVIATION UNDERWRITERS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 19, 1976

Citations

365 A.2d 194 (N.J. 1976)
365 A.2d 194

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

Motor Club Fire Cos. Co. v. N.J. Mfrs. Ins. Co., 71 N.J. 352, 365 A.2d 195 (1976) (5 Justices + 1 judge…