From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gormley v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1989
150 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 1, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, and the motion is denied.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant moved for summary judgment, and the plaintiffs, in opposition, submitted an affidavit of a licensed professional engineer. He asserted that the construction of the sidewalk in question without an expansion joint departed from reasonable engineering and construction standards, creating the dangerous condition which resulted in the plaintiff Marie Gormley's accident. This was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant created or caused a hazardous condition. If the defendant in fact created or caused a hazardous condition, there is no requirement that prior written notice of the condition be given to it in order for it to be liable (see, Nassau County Administrative Code § 12-4.0 [e]; L 1939, chs 272, 701-709, as amended). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gormley v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1989
150 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Gormley v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:MARIE GORMLEY et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 342 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Torres v. City of New York

In this case, plaintiff presented the uncontradicted testimony of its expert that the roadway was improperly…

Strauss v. Town of Oyster Bay

Pursuant to Town of Oyster Bay Code § 46 (1) (b), this action could not be maintained unless the Town…