From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gore v. Kressner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 1990
157 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 23, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (James N. White, J.).


Pursuant to written agreements, defendant agreed to divide the recovery, if any, in various personal injury actions referred to defendant by plaintiff's decedent. It is well settled that such agreements will be upheld in accordance with their terms where the referring attorney "contributed some work, labor or service toward the earning of the fee" (Oberman v. Reilly, 66 A.D.2d 686, 687, lv dismissed 48 N.Y.2d 654; Matter of Fuller, 122 A.D.2d 792; A. Stanley Proner, P.C. v. Julien Schlesinger, 134 A.D.2d 182). We are satisfied that plaintiff's decedent provided sufficient services to justify the judgment in her favor.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.


Summaries of

Gore v. Kressner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 1990
157 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Gore v. Kressner

Case Details

Full title:HILDA GORE, Respondent, v. MARK KRESSNER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 319

Citing Cases

Witt v. Cohen

There was ample evidence to support the Referee's determination that the attorney Bruce Benenfeld should be…

Stinnett v. Sears Roebuck Company

The fact that the agreement was oral does not make it unenforceable (see, Clark v Vicinanzo, 151 A.D.2d 951).…