From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gordon v. Hancock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

376

March 15, 2002.

Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Galloway, J.), entered August 10, 2001, that granted defendants' cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition.

Shapiro, Rosenbaum, Liebschutz Nelson, LLP, Rochester (Sanford R. Shapiro of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Chamberlain D'Amanda Oppenheimer Greenfield, Rochester (Michael A. Sciortino of counsel), for defendants-respondents.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, HAYES, HURLBUTT, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the cross motion is denied.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in granting defendants' cross motion to compel plaintiff to submit to a further deposition. Defendants' failure to comply with 22 NYCRR 202.7 (a) requires denial of the cross motion ( see, Barnes v. NYNEX, Inc., 274 A.D.2d 368; Sixty-Six Crosby Assocs. v. Berger Kramer, 256 A.D.2d 26; Vasquez v. G.A.P.L.W. Realty, 236 A.D.2d 311, 312; Romero v. Korn, 236 A.D.2d 598; Koelbl v. Harvey, 176 A.D.2d 1040).

Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hayes, Hurlbutt, and Lawton, JJ.


Summaries of

Gordon v. Hancock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 15, 2002
292 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Gordon v. Hancock

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE S. GORDON, Plaintiff-appellant, v. MICHELE HANCOCK AND CHARLES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 15, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

Kane v. Shapiro

In addition, the portion of the trial transcript sought by plaintiff is equally available to both parties,…