From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salce v. Wolczek

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 16, 2013
66 A.3d 885 (Conn. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-16

Anthony H. SALCE, Sr. v. Walter WOLCZEK.

Laura Pascale Zaino, John B. Farley, Hartford, and Dan E. LaBelle, Westport, in support of the petition. Jeffrey J. White and Benjamin C. Jensen, Hartford, in opposition.


Laura Pascale Zaino, John B. Farley, Hartford, and Dan E. LaBelle, Westport, in support of the petition. Jeffrey J. White and Benjamin C. Jensen, Hartford, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 141 Conn.App. 528, 61 A.3d 1177, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“In affirming the trial court's entry of both the summary judgment and subsequent judgment in this matter: (1) Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the contract language unambiguously established that the mere execution of a contract for sale, and not the actual closing on the sale, was intended to trigger the defendant's payment obligation?

“(2) If the answer to the first question is in the negative, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's postjudgment interest award?”

ROGERS, C.J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

Salce v. Wolczek

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 16, 2013
66 A.3d 885 (Conn. 2013)
Case details for

Salce v. Wolczek

Case Details

Full title:Anthony H. SALCE, Sr. v. Walter WOLCZEK.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 16, 2013

Citations

66 A.3d 885 (Conn. 2013)
308 Conn. 944

Citing Cases

Salce v. Wolczek

The defendant then petitioned this court for certification. We granted the petition for certification,…

Salce v. Wolczek

The defendant then petitioned this court for certification. We granted the petition for certification,…