From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodnow v. Pedersen

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Nov 30, 2007
File No. 1:06-CV-124 (D. Vt. Nov. 30, 2007)

Opinion

File No. 1:06-CV-124.

November 30, 2007


ORDER (Paper 66)


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed October 24, 2007. After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Dr. Pamela Pedersen, Dr. Sonali Patel and Stuart Gladding (Paper 58) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Dated at Brattleboro, in the District of Vermont.


Summaries of

Goodnow v. Pedersen

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Nov 30, 2007
File No. 1:06-CV-124 (D. Vt. Nov. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Goodnow v. Pedersen

Case Details

Full title:PETER GOODNOW, Plaintiff v. DR. PAMELA PEDERSEN, DR. SONALI PATEL and…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

File No. 1:06-CV-124 (D. Vt. Nov. 30, 2007)

Citing Cases

Ascent HealthCare Solutions, Inc. v. Dumont

Under Vermont law, a valid release is an enforceable contract. Goodnow v. Pedersen, 2007 WL 4268908, at *2…