From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodman v. Fxjtrovsky

U.S.
Mar 21, 1966
383 U.S. 946 (1966)

Summary

holding that a plaintiff could not bring a derivative claim regarding a conflict of interest when this information had been disclosed in previous prospectuses

Summary of this case from Cabaniss v. Deutsche Bank Secs., Inc.

Opinion

No. 932.

March 21, 1966, OCTOBER TERM, 1965,


Sup. Ct. Del. Certiorari denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE BLACK are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Leonard S. Goodman, pro se, and for other petitioner. Leroy A. Brill and William S. Pot ter for respondents Cohen et al. Reported below: ___ Del. ___, 213 A. 2d 899.


Summaries of

Goodman v. Fxjtrovsky

U.S.
Mar 21, 1966
383 U.S. 946 (1966)

holding that a plaintiff could not bring a derivative claim regarding a conflict of interest when this information had been disclosed in previous prospectuses

Summary of this case from Cabaniss v. Deutsche Bank Secs., Inc.
Case details for

Goodman v. Fxjtrovsky

Case Details

Full title:GOODMAN ET UX. v. FXJTROVSKY ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 21, 1966

Citations

383 U.S. 946 (1966)

Citing Cases

Magana v. Elie

The Hospital's motion to dismiss the complaint, premised on the grounds it failed to state a cause of action,…

Johnson v. St. Bernard Hospital

As previously discussed, a hospital may be held liable for the negligent acts of its employees and agents.…