Opinion
Submitted February 16, 1934 —
Decided May 4, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 811.
For the appellants, Raskin Hornstein.
For the respondent, James A. Hamill.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, DILL, JJ. 8.
For reversal — PARKER, LLOYD, PERSKIE, KAYS, WELLS, JJ. 5.