From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodman Chesnoff v. Nikols

Utah Court of Appeals
Mar 4, 2010
2010 UT App. 53 (Utah Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 20100046-CA.

Filed March 4, 2010.

Appeal from the Third District, Salt Lake Department, 050921826 The Honorable John Paul Kennedy.

L. Rex Sears, Salt Lake City, for Appellant.

Scott O. Mercer and Scott S. Bridge, Salt Lake City, for Appellees.

Before Judges Thorne, Voros, and Greenwood.

The Honorable Pamela T. Greenwood, Senior Judge, sat by special assignment pursuant to Utah Code section 78A-3-102 (2008) and rule 11-201(6) of the Utah Rules of Judicial Administration.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


John Nikols seeks to appeal the trial court's denial of his objection to a writ of execution permitting the sale of properties titled in his son Michael Nikols's name. This matter is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a final order.

Appeals as of right typically may be taken only from final orders or judgments. See Utah R. App. P. 3(a). Generally, an appeal taken from an order that is not final is improper and this court must dismiss it. See Bradbury v. Valencia, 2000 UT 50, ¶¶ 8-9, 5 P.3d 649. "[T]he law is well settled in the state that the statements made by a trial judge are not the judgment of the case and it is only the signed judgment that prevails."State v. Gerrard, 584 P.2d 885, 887 (Utah 1978). Accordingly, oral rulings from the bench are not final and appealable.See id.

The trial court held a hearing as requested by Nikols. After hearing Nikols's objections, the trial court overruled the objections and required counsel to prepare an order. Nikols objected to the form of the proposed order formalizing the trial court's ruling. Nikols's objections to the order are pending before the trial court. As a result, the actual judgment remains in flux and there is no final order from which to appeal. Unless and until a final order is entered, this court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss this appeal. See Bradbury, 2000 UT 50, ¶ 8.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the timely filing of a notice of appeal after the entry of a final order.

Both parties filed motions for summary disposition on grounds other than jurisdiction. These motions are rendered moot by this decision.

William A. Thorne Jr., Judge, Pamela T. Greenwood, Senior Judge.

I CONCUR IN THE RESULT: J. Frederic Voros Jr., Judge.


Summaries of

Goodman Chesnoff v. Nikols

Utah Court of Appeals
Mar 4, 2010
2010 UT App. 53 (Utah Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Goodman Chesnoff v. Nikols

Case Details

Full title:Goodman Chesnoff, a Nevada corporation; and David Z. Chesnoff, Plaintiffs…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 4, 2010

Citations

2010 UT App. 53 (Utah Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Nikols v. Chesnoff

The appeal was transferred to the Utah Court of Appeals. Goodman Chesnoff v. Nikols, No. 20100046, 2010 UT…