From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2012
Case No.: 1:12-at-00014 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-at-00014

01-11-2012

CHRISTOPHER GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ON APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


(Docket No. 2)

On January 9, 2012, Plaintiff Christopher Gonzalez ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 2.) The Court determined that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis failed to provide complete responses to Questions 3, 4, and 5. Specifically, the application failed to answer either "yes" or "no" as required to those questions. As such, the Court cannot make a final determination as to Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff file a revised application to proceed in forma pauperis within ten (10) days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2012
Case No.: 1:12-at-00014 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-at-00014 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)