From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1999
261 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 17, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly addressed the merits of the cross motion, notwithstanding that it was made more than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue ( see, CPLR 3212 [a]; Quinlan v. Kaufman, 258 A.D.2d 453). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, based on the testimony by the sole eyewitness to the accident and the absence of any evidence of negligence by the defendants ( see, Kiernan v. Hendrick, 116 A.D.2d 779, 780-781).

S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1999
261 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp.

Case Details

Full title:INOCENTE GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. 98 MAG LEASING CORP. et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 17, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 508 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Singh v. Rajkumar

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. The Supreme Court properly addressed the merits of the…

Miller v. Sisters of the Order of St. Dominic

The plaintiff was allegedly injured when he was hit by a car owned by the defendant Sisters of the Order of…