From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Patterson

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 20, 1966
370 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. 9040.

December 20, 1966.

Thomas Garrett, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellant.

James W. Creamer, Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before LEWIS, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.


Appellant is presently confined in the Colorado state penitentiary after and by virtue of a parole revocation. He sought a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado alleging that he had been denied the rights of confrontation and the assistance of counsel at the revocation hearings. The trial court summarily denied relief.

Affirmed. See Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490, 55 S.Ct. 818, 79 L.Ed. 1566; Johnson v. Tinsley, 234 F. Supp. 866 (Colo.), aff'd mem. 337 F.2d 856.


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Patterson

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Dec 20, 1966
370 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1966)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:Charles A. GONZALES, Appellant, v. Wayne K. PATTERSON, Warden, Colorado…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Dec 20, 1966

Citations

370 F.2d 94 (10th Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Patterson

The sole issue which merits consideration is the contention that the parole revocation was invalid because at…

Wilkerson v. Patterson

The sole issue which merits consideration is the contention that the parole revocation was invalid because at…