From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 13, 1971
471 S.W.2d 393 (Tex. Crim. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 44514.

October 13, 1971.

Appeal from the 143rd Judicial District Court, Reeves County, J. H. Starley, J.

Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


OPINION


This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of theft of property over the value of $50.00. The punishment was assessed at two years, probated. Judgment was entered November 16, 1970. The order granting probation was entered January 15, 1971, and notice of appeal was given February 22, 1971.

The appellant was represented by the Honorable Murray J. Howze, who died in February, 1971.

The record shows that counsel died prior to the time of the completion of the record. There is no showing that the appellant was notified of the completion of the record or that he had any knowledge of his attorney's death. There is no showing that the appellant was represented by any attorney other than Mr. Howze. Notice of completion of the record is required before an appellant is required to file his appellate brief in the trial court. See Article 40.09, Section 7, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.

In the interest of justice, this appeal will be abated so that notice of completion of the record can be given to the appellant personally so that appellant may secure assistance of counsel on appeal. See Chavez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W.2d 392, this day decided.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Gomez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 13, 1971
471 S.W.2d 393 (Tex. Crim. App. 1971)
Case details for

Gomez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Concepcion GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 13, 1971

Citations

471 S.W.2d 393 (Tex. Crim. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

Watson v. State

See Article 40.09, Section 13, V.A.C.C.P. There is no indication of appellant's indigency in the record; and,…

Trevino v. State

In cases where a defendant was denied counsel during the post-trial review proceedings under Article 40.09,…