From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gomez-Jimenez v. N.Y. Law Sch.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 28, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 68698 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-28

Alexandra GOMEZ–JIMENEZ, et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL, Respondent, Does 1–20, et al., Defendants.


Reported below, 103 A.D.3d 13, 956 N.Y.S.2d 54.

Motion for leave to appeal denied with one hundred dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ and PIGOTT concur.
Judge Smith Dissents and votes to grant leave to appeal.

Judge RIVERA took no part.


Summaries of

Gomez-Jimenez v. N.Y. Law Sch.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 28, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 68698 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Gomez-Jimenez v. N.Y. Law Sch.

Case Details

Full title:Alexandra GOMEZ–JIMENEZ, et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Mar 28, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 68698 (N.Y. 2013)
20 N.Y.3d 1093
965 N.Y.S.2d 78
987 N.E.2d 639

Citing Cases

Ward v. Theladders.com, Inc.

With all these factors taken together, the plaintiffs cannot plausibly show reasonable reliance on the…

Salvador v. Touro Coll.

“A claim for negligent misrepresentation requires the plaintiff to demonstrate (1) the existence of a…