From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldy v. Jaeger

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 19, 1924
124 A. 765 (N.J. 1924)

Opinion

Submitted March 24, 1924 —

Decided May 19, 1924.

The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

On appeal from the Passaic County Circuit Court.

Plaintiff sued defendant in an action at law in the Passaic County Circuit Court. The amended complaint contained two counts. Plaintiff abandoned the first one, and the judge, on motion, struck out the second count and entered judgment for defendants.

For the appellant, Merritt Lane and Filbert L. Rosenstein.

For the respondents, Ward McGinnis and John O. Benson.


The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MINTURN, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, CLARK, McGLENNON, JJ. 8.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, BLACK, LLOYD, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, JJ. 8.


Summaries of

Goldy v. Jaeger

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 19, 1924
124 A. 765 (N.J. 1924)
Case details for

Goldy v. Jaeger

Case Details

Full title:LEWIS H. GOLDY, APPELLANT, v. OTTO JAEGER, CHARLES SIMON, JR., AND THOMAS…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 19, 1924

Citations

124 A. 765 (N.J. 1924)
124 A. 765

Citing Cases

Holltorf v. Walker

Those provisions of the contract which form the basis of the majority opinion do not indicate to me such a…