From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldstein v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 16, 1930
130 So. 315 (Ala. 1930)

Opinion

6 Div. 669.

October 16, 1930.

Patrick Appelbaum and Richard H. Fries, all of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Coleman, Coleman, Spain Stewart, of Birmingham, for respondent.


Petition of Henry Goldstein, doing business as Hudson Bay Fur Company, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Goldstein v. Harris, 130 So. 313.

We concur in the result announced on the principle stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, that the specific moneys were obtained from the insurance company, and ex aequo et bono belonged to plaintiff; hence the right of recovery.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldstein v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 16, 1930
130 So. 315 (Ala. 1930)
Case details for

Goldstein v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:Henry GOLDSTEIN, etc., v. Claire E. HARRIS

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 16, 1930

Citations

130 So. 315 (Ala. 1930)
221 Ala. 612

Citing Cases

Goldstein v. Harris

Affirmed. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Goldstein v. Harris, 221 Ala. 612, 130 So. 315. Patrick…