Opinion
No. 10-P-1462.
May 12, 2011.
DECISIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Goldstein v. Enanta Pharmaceuticals
Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 12, 2011
946 N.E.2d 715 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011)
Summaries of
Goldstein v. Enanta Pharmaceuticals
Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 12, 2011
946 N.E.2d 715 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011)
Case details for
Goldstein v. Enanta Pharmaceuticals
Case Details
Full title:RONALD GOLDSTEIN v. ENANTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: May 12, 2011
Citations
946 N.E.2d 715 (Mass. App. Ct. 2011)
79 Mass. App. Ct. 1117
Citing Cases
Zurich American Ins. Co. v. Watts Regulator Co.
In order to prevail on a Chapter 93A claim premised on a breach of contract, the breach must be “so egregious…