From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldsmith v. Comm'r

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 25, 2019
No. 18-1346 (8th Cir. Feb. 25, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-1346

02-25-2019

Scott Kimrey Goldsmith Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Appellee


Appeal from The United States Tax Court [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Scott Goldsmith appeals from a tax court decision, which granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and sustained a notice of federal tax lien, in proceedings Goldsmith initiated under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6320 and 6330. Following a careful de novo review, see Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm'r, 594 F.3d 968, 970 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the tax court's grant of summary judgment de novo), we conclude that the Commissioner's determination was correct, for the reasons explained by the tax court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Mark V. Holmes, United States Tax Court Judge.


Summaries of

Goldsmith v. Comm'r

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Feb 25, 2019
No. 18-1346 (8th Cir. Feb. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Goldsmith v. Comm'r

Case Details

Full title:Scott Kimrey Goldsmith Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 2019

Citations

No. 18-1346 (8th Cir. Feb. 25, 2019)