From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldman v. New York City Health and Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1992
186 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 13, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion is denied.

In her notice of claim, the plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that in the course of treating her, the defendants, a hospital and individual physicians, "committed acts and/or omissions constituting professional negligence". This notice of claim sufficiently apprised the defendants of the second through tenth causes of action premised on lack of informed consent so as to enable them to conduct a proper investigation (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e; DeLeonibus v Scognamillo, 183 A.D.2d 697; O'Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353). Accordingly, those causes of action are reinstated. Mangano, P.J., Sullivan, O'Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldman v. New York City Health and Hospitals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 13, 1992
186 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Goldman v. New York City Health and Hospitals

Case Details

Full title:LUCIENNE GOLDMAN, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 13, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 629 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 412

Citing Cases

Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. Harter

Such requirements are pragmatic, aimed at assuring that public sector entities with their deep pockets are…