From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldberg v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-10537

Submitted November 13, 2001

December 3, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated September 11, 2000, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Joseph J. Ra, Town Attorney, Hempstead, N.Y. (Alison J. Lewis of counsel), for appellant.

Brand Brand, Garden City, N.Y. (Randall M. Elfenbein and Charles R. Gueli of counsel), for respondents.

Before: LEO F. McGINITY, J.P., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Here, the infant plaintiff, a fairly experienced cyclist, was riding her bicycle on a dirt base path of a baseball field owned and maintained by the defendant. She fell and injured her left ankle when her bicycle struck a hole in the ground that was open and obvious, as illustrated by a photograph submitted by the plaintiffs.

Since the risk of striking a hole and falling is an inherent risk in riding a bicycle on most outdoor surfaces (see, Schiavone v. Brinewood Rod Gun Club, Inc., 283 A.D.2d 234; Calise v. City of New York, 239 A.D.2d 378), and the defective condition in this case was open and obvious, the infant plaintiff assumed the risk associated with riding her bicycle on the ballfield (see, Sykes v. County of Erie, 94 N.Y.2d 912, affg 263 A.D.2d 947; Gamble v. Town of Hempstead, 281 A.D.2d 391; Paone v. County of Suffolk, 251 A.D.2d 563; Strauss v. Town of Oyster Bay, 201 A.D.2d 553). The defendant discharged its duty of care by making the field as safe as it appeared to be (see, Turcotte v. Fell, 68 N.Y.2d 432; Gallagher v. Town of N. Hempstead, 144 A.D.2d 637).

McGINITY, J.P., LUCIANO, FEUERSTEIN and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goldberg v. Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 2001
289 A.D.2d 198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Goldberg v. Town of Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:NINA GOLDBERG, ETC., ET AL., respondents, v. TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 691

Citing Cases

Z.D. v. BORO PARK TOWNHOUSES ASSOC., LP

Defendants point to the infant plaintiff's age, nearly 14 at the time of the accident, and that she had been…

Spink v. State

Recently, the Third Department affirmed the Court of Claims finding that a bicyclist, injured when her tire…