From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gold-Land, Inc. v. Haskell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1998
248 A.D.2d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 3, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins J.).


The IAS Court's implicit denial of plaintiff's motion for a Yellowstone inujunction was proper, but, upon reaching that determination, it should have dismissed the action. CPLR 325 (d) was not a proper vehicle for trasferring this action to Civil Court. The parties may raise any outstanding issues in the commercial landlord tenant part of Civil Court ( Lun Far Co. v. Aylesbury Assocs., 40 A.D.2d 794), if so advised.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Gold-Land, Inc. v. Haskell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1998
248 A.D.2d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Gold-Land, Inc. v. Haskell

Case Details

Full title:GOLD-LAND, INC., Doing Business as LYN'S CAFE, Appellant, v. STEVEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 132 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 804

Citing Cases

Zmoore, Ltd. v. Kingman Mgmt. LLC

Any argument by the plaintiff that the notice to cure lacks specificity with alleged defaults and fails to…

Campaniello v. Greene St. Holding Corp.

As the Court has now determined that the sublet fee was validly imposed and that the plaintiff is required to…