From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Aug 14, 1984
676 S.W.2d 64 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 47979.

August 14, 1984.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, PHILIP G. HESS, J.

J. Andrew Walker, William J. Shaw, Public Defenders, Clayton, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Rule 27.26 motion dismissed without an evidentiary hearing. The sequence of events mandates reversal and remand for appointment of counsel.

4-21-83 — Pro se. Rule 27.26 motion filed and Ted Guberman, Public Defender appointed to represent movant.

5-25-83 — Frank K. Carlson, as attorney for movant, filed a request for a transcript.

7-11-83 — Ted Guberman notified of State's motion to dismiss.

7-14-83 — Frank K. Carlson filed motion for leave to withdraw. On the motion was a notation to notify Carlson to be here for hearing of motion to dismiss on 7-26-83. There was another notation Carlson was notified.

7-26-83 — Letter from Ted Guberman to a St. Louis County Public Defender advising of conflict and advising him the trial judge wanted him to enter his appearance immediately.

9-9-83 — State filed motion to dismiss and mailed a copy to Ted Guberman.

9-13-83 — Circuit clerk notified Ted Guberman the case was set for hearing on 10-31-83.

10-13-83 — Letter from movant to circuit clerk requesting a copy of his motion and inquiring if his request for a transcript was approved.

10-31-83 — Motion to dismiss sustained without comment as to whether or not movant appeared by attorney.

The record shows movant, for whatever reason, may not have had adequate legal representation. Wheatley v. State, 559 S.W.2d 526 (Mo. banc 1977). Neither lawyer took any affirmative steps on behalf of movant, and each indicated he did not want to serve.

The judgment sustaining the motion to dismiss is reversed and the cause remanded for the appointment of counsel and for further proceedings on movant's Rule 27.26 motion.

REINHARD, C.J., and DOWD, J., concur.


Summaries of

Goings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Aug 14, 1984
676 S.W.2d 64 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Goings v. State

Case Details

Full title:GARY LEWAYNE GOINGS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Aug 14, 1984

Citations

676 S.W.2d 64 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Webster v. State

Counsel did not file an amended Rule 29.15 motion. This court has reversed denial of post-conviction motions…

State v. Daly

In Webster, the motion court summarily dismissed the appellant's 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief and…